Skip to main content

Release Readiness

Qaptly does not decide if a release is “good” or “bad”. It shows you how the behavior of your product has changed — and what risk that creates. This is what release readiness really means.

What Qaptly Compares

Every time you run Qaptly, it builds a behavioral profile of your product:

States

The states that exist in your product

Transitions

The transitions between states

Conditions

The conditions that affect outcomes

User Paths

The paths users can take
For each new version, Qaptly compares this profile to previous versions.

What Changes Mean

A release becomes risky when:
  • ✋ New states appear — Untested functionality introduced
  • ❌ Existing states disappear — Features removed or broken
  • 🔄 Transitions behave differently — User flows changed unexpectedly
  • ⚠️ Conditions lead to new outcomes — Logic changes with unknown effects
  • 📉 Previously stable flows become unstable — Regressions detected
Qaptly detects all of these automatically by comparing behavioral models.

From Test Results to Risk Signals

Instead of saying:

“These tests passed”

Qaptly can say:

“These user flows now behave differently” “These conditions now produce new results” “These parts of the system are less predictable than before”
This is what determines whether a release is safe.

Release Readiness Criteria

A release is ready when:
1

Critical Flows Behave as Expected

Core user journeys work correctly and consistently
2

State Space is Stable

No unexpected states or missing expected states
3

Risk Surface Hasn't Expanded Dangerously

New risks are understood and acceptable
4

Behavior Matches Business Requirements

Product functions align with what the business relies on
Qaptly gives you the evidence to make that call.

The Readiness Dashboard

Qaptly provides comprehensive comparison views:
Side-by-side comparison of state models between versions
  • New states highlighted
  • Removed states flagged
  • Changed transitions marked
Automatic risk scoring based on:
  • Untested new functionality
  • Changed critical paths
  • Increased error rates
  • Performance degradation
How test coverage changed:
  • New areas covered
  • Previously tested areas now untested
  • Coverage percentage trends
Flow reliability over time:
  • Flaky test detection
  • Consistency scores
  • Success rate trends

Making the Decision

Ship with Confidence
  • ✅ All critical flows stable
  • ✅ No new high-risk states
  • ✅ Behavior changes are expected
  • ✅ Coverage meets or exceeds threshold
  • ✅ No significant regressions
Evidence: Behavioral profile matches expectations

Evidence-Based Confidence

With Qaptly, you can answer:
This turns release decisions from guesswork into informed risk management.

What Qaptly Considers Coverage

Understanding coverage metrics

Evidence-Based Results

Quality evidence

Build the Product Model

How behavioral profiles are built

Next Steps

Continue exploring quality and testing: